Showing posts with label Myspace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Myspace. Show all posts

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Podcast - Growing Up Online

This week we had an assignment due in our Social Media for Public Relations class where we had to design and record a podcast, editing and all. My group, which included Ceci Garcia, Christine Pegg, and Wiltson Bramson, did our podcast on growing up online and differences in internet/social media use between generation y and generation z. We based a lot of our discussion off of the PBS program Growing Up Online which we watched as a class last week.

Although our discussion was kept quite brief -- the length of the podcast was supposed to be 5-10 minutes -- we each took the opportunity to touch on several different aspects of social media such as Facebook, MySpace, and YouTube. I have included the show notes below so that you can get a better idea of what the podcast covers:

:05 – Intro

:26 – Shannon introduces the show and welcomes the guests.

:41 – The panel introduces themselves.

1:23 – The Hot Topic is introduced for discussion: growing up online.

1:33 – Shannon discusses generation definitions for better understanding of discussion. Concept of "Gen C" is introduced.

1:58 – Shannon asks panel to comment on the differences they feel exist between Gen Y and Gen Z/C in regards to internet usage

2:09 – Ceci discusses YouTube and its impact on users

3:42 – Wiltson discusses Facebook usage

5:21 – Christine discusses MySpace and its effects

6:04 – Shannon and Wiltson weigh in on Facebook and MySpace

6:46 – Shannon discusses cell phones and SMS (text) messaging and how it has affected the generations

8:16 – Wiltson weighs in on texting

8:49 – Ceci discusses Second Life in regards to the generations

10:35 – Shannon and Wiltson respond with commentary on Second Life

12:09 – Closing

12:20 – Outro

You can listen to the podcast by clicking here.

Sunday, September 14, 2008

Privacy and the Internet

Oh the 2008 presidential election.... I'm not one for politics, most of the time anyway, because I don't feel I know enough about the facts to form an opinion that I'm willing to stand by relentlessly (like so many people are.) But, with all the drama (yes, I prefer to see it as drama) surrounding the candidates I've had a hard time staying out of it.

I recently received an email regarding Republican vice-president hopeful Sarah Palin, forwarded to me by my mother. It first caught my attention because it opened with the following statement:

Dear friends,
So many people have asked me about what I know about Sarah Palin in the last 2 days that I decided to write something up . . .
Basically, Sarah Palin and Hillary Clinton have only 2 things in common: their gender and their good looks. :)
You have my permission to forward this to your friends/email contacts with my name and email address attached, but please do not post it on any websites, as
there are too many kooks out there . . .
Thanks,
Anne

When I mentioned the email to my dad, his first response was "give it a few days and it will be all over the news". Being naive, I told him that I doubted it and believed the email would stay in circulation but didn't think anyone would end up posting it anywhere. I suppose I thought the author's wishes would be respected.

Turns out I was way wrong. Crosscut News of Seattle reprinted the email with sites like Digg.com and Zimbio picking up the story. I guess what perplexes me is Crosscut is claiming they reprinted the email
in its entirety yet they clearly leave out the introduction from Anne asking that the email doesn't make it on the web.


Obviously several things could have happened here... For one, Anne may have granted the website permission to post the email sans the introduction. However, I think its more likely the email was picked up and posted without the introduction and without permission.


Either way, the story is out. I suppose the author knew deep down her words would not stay secret for long. It would be unrealistic to expect such a substantial commentary on Palin to circulate the web (though through private email) and be completely ignored by the media. However, it further demonstrates that in the new age of the internet, nothing is private. It is becoming more and more difficult to keep your private life seperate from your public. I think Ashley makes a good point of this dilemma in her recent blogpost.


What do you think? Do you think that Crosscut picked up the email and posted it with permission? If not, do you still think the decision to post the article, claiming it was in entirety, is ethical? Unethical? And, what are your opinions on privacy and the internet? Should personal information via Facebook and Myspace pages be available? Where do we draw the line?